Anyone who reads my stuff on a regular basis knows I worry
about Hollywood’s lack of
originality over the past few years. I actually think movie makers have shown
some flicker of life lately. There have
been a number of interesting films released over the past few months that,
while not the most original works ever, definitely show progress. Some of the movies I’ve watched recently at
least don’t look and feel like they were just churned out of the thoughtless crap
factory.
In Time relies on
a fairly original premise that seems more of an alternate universe rather than
futuristic. Humans have been genetically
engineered to the point of not aging past the age of twenty-five. After that birthday, humans have a clock on
their arm that’s gives them one more year of life and time is counting
down. When it reaches zero, you’re
dead. People can earn and spend time and
time has become the currency of the world.
People work to earn time.
They are paid in minutes, hours, and days. Conversely, coffee, rent, and food cost
time. People tend to live day by day,
even minute to minute because the system is designed take their time. Time can also be given, stolen, loaned, and
gambled. It gives a whole new meaning to
all-in poker.
Behind this system is a shadowy, and ultimately, ill defined
group of people who own every thing.
They distribute time and control everything from the daily cost of
living to interest rates of time on loans.
Their purpose is poorly explained but it seems to be to control
population. The world is divided up into
area codes, populated by the rich – century old people loaded with time and
still looking a youthful twenty-five – and the less fortunate. The masses, those time poor souls living by
the hour, do not mix with the rich and powerful.
The cost of immortality though, is high. Those controlling the system, the people
controlling the distribution of time, are so concerned with accumulating and
harnessing time that they forget how to live.
They spend centuries playing it safe and becoming little more than
robotic drones. The metaphor is subtle
for the most part and I prefer that to a heavy handed blow to the head this
film could have delivered.
The writing in general was a little uneven. The dialogue was especially uninspired. The action sequences were quick and tense
without a lot of flashy, unbelievable stunts.
Director/writer Andrew Nichol wasted little time jumping into the
storyline and he kept the pace brisk.
The movie could have used about ten more minutes of gradual storyline
development. There were a few aspects
that could have been explained more thoroughly.
The final result was sleek and exciting and made for very good
entertainment.
Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried played the leads with
an earnest believability. Both are
growing as actors and were able to carry the load in this film. They were supported mainly by Cillian Murphy
(The Dark Knight and Inception) and Vincent Kartheiser (Mad Men). The latter is Seyfried’s Sylvia father and
one of those shadowy men doling out time.
Murphy plays a timekeeper, basically a cop, who is so good, he is
bad. Both do a fine job and they blend
in with some favorites such as Olivia Wilde, Matt Bomer, and Johnny Galecki,
who all have small, but welled acted roles.
The acting was far from perfect but again, they were working with a less
than perfect script and no one butchered their roles.
In Time won’t win
any statuettes but it gets big marks for originality and entertainment
value. Its sleek action was not bloated
with overwhelming and unreasonable special effects. It carries a PG-13 rating but it does not get
out of hand with sex, language, or violence – each of these get one tiny scene
to earn that rating. My 12-year old son
could watch it if he wanted. The premise
and action make up for the weak dialogue and the acting was good enough not to
be a distraction. I was entertained
throughout and got more than I expected.
All in all, in this day and age, that’s pretty good.
Get twitter updates @jawsrecliner for this blog and for
jawssportsandstuff.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment